Before Arizona, came California! Before Obama lied, his lips moved. (Borders? We don't need no stinkin' BORDERS!)

The Urban Dictionary's first definition of Obamanation:

1. The horrible state of affairs that results after a Barack Obama win as president; (yep, got that right)!

credit

Guess what?  California already had Arizona's law ON THE BOOKS for over ten years before all this ludicrous tempest in a racist teapot being generated by left-wing kooks!

Los Angeles and San Francisco are whining about Arizona's Law...Even the governator has chimed in...

Besides their everyday stupidity, this stupidity goes above and beyond the call of duty...

Ladies and Gentlemen...I give you section 834b of the California Penal Code.

"834b. (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully

cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization
Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is
suspected of being present in the United States in violation of
federal immigration laws.

(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected
of being present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the
following:

(1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen
of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent
resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time
or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of
immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not
be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and
place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding
documentation to indicate his or her legal status.

(2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien
who is present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal
justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or
leave the United States.

(3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United
States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal
status and provide any additional information that may be requested
by any other public entity.

(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city,
county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with
jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent
or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly
prohibited."

~~~~~~~

From Tony Perkins at Family Research Council

197 Million Reasons Not to Trust HHS

Yesterday, while I was on my way home from Honduras, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was trying to cover its tracks on the $160 million taxpayer-funded abortion scheme in the Keystone state. The Obama administration barely had a chance to respond to those allegations before another shoe dropped--this time in New Mexico. The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) had uncovered another money trail under the health care law--worth $37 million--in the Southwest. According to Douglas Johnson of NRLC, "The Department of Health and Human Services has been hiding most of these high-risk plans.... Of the four state plans we've managed to ferret out, two provided coverage of essentially all abortions."

Of course, administration officials (the same ones who vowed to keep taxpayers out of the abortion business) deny the report. But House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) isn't buying it

 

. "In just the past 24 hours, we've learned of two states in which the new federal high risk insurance programs created under ObamaCare and approved by the Obama administration will use federal funds to pay for abortion, despite promises by the White House and Democratic leaders that no such funding would occur under ObamaCare," he said. How many other reports need to surface before Congress admits that the President's Executive Order wasn't worth the paper it was printed on?

 
The White House and HHS know full well that the Executive Order, which the President of Planned Parenthood called a "symbolic gesture," does nothing to stop abortion funding. Even if it had some legal weight, it does not apply to high-risk pools. That explains why the government approved at least two plans that include abortion. HHS did backpedal

 

--first denying that it would fund abortion under ObamaCare, then tempering that direct claim with a more modest response that its plans wouldn't cover abortion other than in cases of rape, incest, and the mother's life. If HHS didn't want to fund abortion, why did it approve abortion in these plans in the first place? Trust, but verify. Meanwhile, the administration will need to issue guidance to its agency to block the abortion funding. But even that could change in the future, which is why Congress needs to pass a full ban on taxpayer-funded abortion, which is soon to be introduced by Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.)

Kenya Gets Lion's Share of Illegal Dollars

Secretary Hillary Clinton is certainly making good on her promise to launch an international goodwill tour for abortion. In January, the former First Lady was clear that the State Department's mission for the next five years is bullying every country to overturn its pro-life laws

 

. In news that broke yesterday, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of USAID, the U.S. Agency for International Development, provided members of Congress with evidence of a plot by the U.S. government to lobby Kenyans to legalize abortion

 

in their new constitution. FRC has been aware of the situation since February when members of our senior staff met with Bishop Anthony Muheria of the Kenyan Diocese of Kitui. When we spoke with him, he told us he believed that organizations were receiving U.S. funds to advocate for a constitution that includes the legalization of abortion-on-demand.

 
This OIG report only confirms Bishop Muheria's worst fears--fears that Congressman Chris Smith shared. He, along with two other U.S. lawmakers, demanded an investigation into whether taxpayer dollars were, in fact, being used to sway people to vote "yes" on the referendum legalizing abortion--a policy that most Kenyans oppose. "There is no doubt that the Obama administration is funding the 'yes' campaign in Kenya ," Rep. Smith said. "By funding [groups] charged with obtaining 'yes' votes, the administration has crossed the line." That "line" is known as the Siljander Amendment, which makes it illegal for the U.S. to use federal funds to lobby for abortion abroad. As part of the talks with the USAID's Inspector General, Congressman Smith learned that seven organizations took home hundreds of thousands of dollars to "contribute to an 'overrepresentation' of the 'Yes' voters."

Now it's important to note that the OIG isn't a partisan entity, so when it suggests that the administration is engaging in illegal activity, there is serious cause for concern. This administration is so determined in pursuing its radical social agenda, that it will stop at nothing--not even the law. To be clear, there's nothing illegal with the U.S. participating in a global get-out-the-vote campaign, but this administration has gone well beyond that to using American tax dollars to support a Kenyan law that will greatly expand abortion. The President's wholesale promotion of abortion isn't just seeping into American policy; it's turning the State Department into a lawless, international ACORN.

God help us all!